Indiana

  Aviation Lawyers.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
July 20, 2010
Aviation
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Aviation News

 

Families Of Victims Of Flight 522 File Lawsuit Against Boeing In United States Court

Chicago, Illinois - Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, in cooperation with the Cyprus law firm Phoebus, Christos Clerides, N. Pirilides & Associates, of Nicosia and Limassol, announced that families of victims of the crash of Helios Flight 522 filed a lawsuit  against The Boeing Company in United States District Court in Chicago, Illinois. One hundred and fifteen passengers and six crew members died on August 14, 2005, when the Boeing 737-300 apparently flew without cabin pressure and then crashed north of Athens, Greece.

The investigation of the crash of the Helios Airways Flight 522 has reportedly found that the pressurization system on the plane was not properly configured by the pilots at the time the aircraft took off from Larnaca, Cyprus. However, Robert L. Lieff, founding partner of the American law firm Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, explained that "while there appears to have been negligence on the part of the Helios pilots, Boeing was also negligent and shares responsibility for the passengers’ deaths."

Christos Clerides, whose firm will spearhead efforts to prosecute claims against Helios itself, is working in partnership with Lieff Cabraser in representing the families in pursuing Boeing and any other U.S. manufacturers who may have contributed to the accident. Mr. Clerides stated, "I am very pleased to take this step forward in achieving justice for my clients. We intend to make sure that no responsible party escapes accountability for this horrible tragedy."

Nigel Taylor, an attorney with Lieff Cabraser based in London and one of Europe’s most experienced aviation attorneys, stated, "This lawsuit holds out great hope for the victim families to get fair compensation, and we have an outstanding team in place to achieve that end."

Hans-Peter Graf, a former airline commander and investigator in charge at the Swiss Aircraft Accidents Investigation Bureau who specializes in flight operation and human factors, has been retained by Lieff Cabraser to work on this case. Mr. Graf commented, "The checklists that Boeing composed and recommended for the 737 aircraft made it easy for crews to take off and fly with the pressurization system set incorrectly. The alerts and warnings given to the crew were inexcusably vague and late. The design and implementation of a superior system would have cost a minimal amount. Thus, I am firmly convinced that Boeing and its partners played a substantial role in this crash, and they could have prevented it with a proper design of the crew alerting system."

The complaint alleges that a series of design defects in the Boeing 737-300 led to the pilots’ failure to understand the nature of the problems they were facing. Foremost among these was that the pressurization warning "horn" on the Boeing 737-300 emits the same sound used to alert pilots about improper takeoff and landing configurations. The pilots’ confusion was compounded by the fact that the very danger being warned of – low cabin air pressure – impairs cognitive functions. "If you are warning about a dangerous condition that impairs a pilot’s ability to think, it is common sense that you make that warning as clear as possible, and Boeing did not do that," commented Robert L. Lieff.

The complaint alleges that two years before the Helios accident, in 2003, Boeing communicated to 737 operators that "flight crews may not recognize the [aircraft pressurization failure] horn as an alert of excessive cabin altitude." Yet, commented Robert L. Lieff, "Boeing took no corrective action in response to this potential safety hazard other than ask 737 operators to revise their manuals. Boeing could have eliminated the confusion from multiple uses of the same horn by using a vocal warning or a unique horn, through an inexpensive modification to the 737 pressurization warning system."

Are you seeking legal information regarding Indiana aviation laws? If so, contact our expert Indiana aviation attorneys today!

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Aviation Insurance loss (Aircraft Hull and Liability, War Risks, and Hangar) totals are very high from 1990-1998
Hull loss value ($M) of Western built aircraft - total losses and major partial losses Source: Aviation Insurance Offices Association (AIOA) Losses totaled since 1990 $6.565 billion dollars.

 


  Newsroom  
 


News about Aviation cases in Indiana and nationwide:

Families Of Victims Of Flight 522 File Lawsuit Against Boeing In United States Court
Chicago, Illinois - Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, in cooperation with the Cyprus law firm Phoebus, Christos Clerides, N. Pirilides &...
Read more >


NTSB Reports Increase In Aviation Accidents
The National Transportation Safety Board today released preliminary statistics for 2005 showing an overall increase in civil aviation accidents for...
Read more >


More Aviation News >

 
 

Aviation Lawyers.com Terms

 


Today's Terms

Weeping wing

Definition:
Deicing systems pump fluid from a reservoir through a mesh screen embedded in the leading edges of the wings and tail. depend on airflow as well, and if the primary air intake ices, an alternate air door either opens automatically

Induction System Ice

Definition:
Not all aircraft ice is structural; induction icing is the cause of many accidents.

VASI

Definition:
Visual approach slope indicators provides visual descent guidance during the approach to a runway. The lights are arranged in bars and vary in number from two to 16.

More Aviation Lawyers.com Terms >

 

Aviation Law Resources

 


Search Aviation Law resources in our resource center:

More Aviation Resources >

 

Aviation Legal Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Aviation Law:

  • Small Plane Crash Icing
  • Pilot Errors & Negligence
  • Maintenance Problems
  • Violating FAA Regulations
  • Structural Design Problems

More Aviation Topics >

Indiana Aviation Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Aviation attorney you should contact our Aviation Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Bloomington
  • Brownsburg
  • Carmel
  • Columbus
  • Connersville
  • Crawfordsville
  • Crown Point
  • East Chicago
  • Elkhart
  • Evansville
  • Fishers
  • Fort Wayne
  • Franklin
  • Goshen
  • Granger
  • Greenfield
  • Greenwood
  • Hobart
  • Huntington
  • Indianapolis
  • Jeffersonville
  • Kokomo
  • La Porte
  • Lafayette
  • Logansport
  • Marion
  • Martinsville
  • Merrillville
  • Michigan City
  • Mishawaka
  • Muncie
  • New Albany
  • New Castle
  • Newburgh
  • Noblesville
  • Peru
  • Plainfield
  • Portage
  • Richmond
  • Seymour
  • Shelbyville
  • South Bend
  • Terre Haute
  • Valparaiso
  • Vincennes
  • West Lafayette
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Indiana Aviation Lawyers.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.